Saturday, January 14, 2012

Is this a disgusting use of the Human Rights legislation?

The lawyers of the mother of baby Peter are insisting that she should not only be provided with a new identity ( which costs a large sum of money) but the tax payer should also fund this! What do they think we are fools?Is this a disgusting use of the Human Rights legislation?The death penalty would avoid such court actions and also reduce the incidence of crimes that initiate bizarre requests from the convicted.

Is this a disgusting use of the Human Rights legislation?
It amazes me that people actually think, that by people naming these monsters, it has put this legislation in motion, are these people naive to think that this wouldn't of happened if they hadn't been named on different sites, the lawyers were planning it from the start, they knew that people would be in uproar at this evil crime and used this to their advantage, people want to see justice done and the standards of British justice DO NOT fit the severity of the crime committed, 14 years in my opinion isn't enough, they should never be released, the right to life part of the Human Rights Legislation is ironic, that little boy had the right to life, to feel loved and be part of a loving family, but didn't because he was failed be everyone who was suposed to protect him, why then should I as a British Taxpayer be expected to pay for these people to be protected, I hope they fail miserably in protecting them, just like they did for Baby Peter Is this a disgusting use of the Human Rights legislation?Actually yes they do think you are fools - and I have to agree with them, every single person who named and shamed these evil people on this and other internet sites should hang their heads in shame.



The judge in a UK court ordered the names not be revealed for a reason - but oh no people thought they knew best. What an earth are they going to do with the information.....? Do they expect to see her walking down their street with a big sign saying I am Jane Bloggs (obviously real name) please kick me hard.



I for one would rather my tax money be spent on protecting children not evil twisted women like her but no people had to defy the court and judge and this is what we get.



Is everyone happy now?



For the record - I care not one jot about her and hope she has the worst life imaginable, I hope she dies a long, lonely and painful death and rots in hell. I just wont be the one who will assist in that death.



And now we have people demanding to know who was that vile bastard in Sheffield - obviously they dont think his children have suffured enough and believe they are doing them a favour by sharing their names with the world.
Any lawyer that acts on behalf of filth like baby P's mother should be ashamed of themselves. They could'nt really stoop any lower.

If I were a lawyer no amount of money, even several million would not make me defend such scum. How can they sleep at night knowing what their evil pond life client did to that defenceless baby. Blood money.



When she comes out, in the few years that she gets, she should be looking over her shoulder 24/7 for the rest of her life. And eventually when she dies, she should be tossed in skip and disposed of down the refuse tip.



Is this a disgusting use of the Human Rights legislation?Honestly Plato, I think the Human Rights Act is a thorn in the side of the British Justice system. It is like a blanket get out clause. It is like the 'right to family life' clause meaning services have to protect children and at the same time be respecting a family's right to live, it is a total contradiction and no wonder it failing. Right to anonymity only serves for victims and families of victims to harbour anger.

For me it's not so much about the money but the ethics of it and in my eyes it is very unpeaceful for the greater numberIs this a disgusting use of the Human Rights legislation?
why is this woman being considered for release?

she is a danger to children and should spend the rest of her life behind bars only leaving in a wooden box

disgusting use of human rights lawyers are crooks i bet they are not thinking of justice only thinking about the kudos they will get among the lawyer community for being so clever in helping a client

how do they sleep at night
Yes of course but it will continue to be done as it has with James Bulgers killers and Maxine Carr. Its one of those things that disgusts people (myself included) that you can go out, commit an awful crime and torture and kill an innocent child or watch it happen, serve a pitiful prision sentance then leave with a brand new identity. Even if people say "yes but they have to live with it", they are living with it yes but they have their life, their victims dont.Is this a disgusting use of the Human Rights legislation?
I agree with Cool Hal and have hung my head in shame already. I was so appalled by what I was reading I wanted vengeance and I wanted it now. I wanted names and faces to focus my hatred and externalise it.



And the result of all of those people crying 'name and shame the bastards' is this - we are fools.
Yes - lets us know what her name is and where she is living so we can go round and rip her limb from limb , torturing her in the process! Whoa hang on a minute if we treat her like she treated baby P who going to be the ones that cold bloody pull us limb from limb? and dosnt it make us as bad as her?
lawyers are a sickeningly clever bunch... circumventing the law to further their career



the mother of baby p and the other 2 individuals have been told this by their legal team






So now we all have to pay for the fact that she's an appalling human being and a useless parent.

That's British justice for you.
that's lawyers for ye honey, how anyone can

defend scum like that is beyond me.
yes



but perhaps they should wait to see if she survives her prison sentence first
and these are the very low life's who would tell us that crime does not pay
In Human Right Declaration,

Article 3

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.



Since you are enjoying the right of Article 3, you should enable other to enjoy that article!!

No comments:

Post a Comment