How involved in creating legislation are the monarchs of England?

Not so much involved when legislation 'created'. This done by Parliament. However Queen make effort for read everything....sometime take advice...sometime perhaps make suggestion...then approve legislation.



Have read that Queen take this very seriously, spend much time read.How involved in creating legislation are the monarchs of England?very influential through tradition

tend to act as millstonesHow involved in creating legislation are the monarchs of England?
The Monarchs of England were absolute monarchs and more or less ruled as they pleased. Be-headings of Prime Ministers and reluctant politicians were common.How involved in creating legislation are the monarchs of England?A bill passed by Parliament does not become law unless it is granted "Royal Assent". No 20th or 21st century monarch has denied assent to a Parliamentary bill. The last monarch to refuse assent was Queen Anne in 1708.



In the 15th century, it became the practice of Parliament to initiate legislation. These "bills" became law only if the sovereign assented to them. As the balance of power shifted from the Crown to the Parliament, denials became less frequent. The last instance occurred on March 11, 1708, when Queen Anne refused assent for a bill "for the settling of militia in Scotland".How involved in creating legislation are the monarchs of England?
They can only make suggestions and dole out advice,talk to the Prime Minister and members of Parliament,passing on things that they heard the people say because the Constitution bars them from doing the day to day political work.Today's monarch reads State Papers and signs bills into action on the advice of the elected Prime Minister;being Head of Nation involves other works.How involved in creating legislation are the monarchs of England?They have little to no involvement in creating legislation, however they do advise, warn, and encourage the prime minister with regards to pending legislation. Once legislation is passed by parliament it is sent to the monarch where he/she studies and then signs it into being; until it is signed by the monarch it is not law. This veto power is not unique to monarchs; all heads of state whether they be elected to their positions or born to them have this power.



If they refuse to sign the law it would create what we call a constitutional crisis: example: The monarch refuses to sign, the law would be sent back to parliament where it would be debated again, it may be passed again, and then the monarch would refuse to sign it again, this would stall the government, which might result in them trying to abolish the monarchy, this would be technically illegal for them to even attempt.



Furthermore, if the law was something detrimental to the well being of the nation and if it was opposed by the people and the population became aware that their monarch had refused to sign it and then they saw the government trying to circumvent or abolish the monarchy all hell could very well break lose: riots, strikes, etc. it's also important to note that the monarch is head of the armed forces who take their oath to her/him, not the government, so things could get very ugly indeed.



The chances of any of this happening are minuscule of course, the monarchs of the 21st century try to maintain absolute neutrality in politics. However, knowing that it could happen puts a very real and vital cheque of power on any politician that may come along with grand designs bordering on tyranny.

electric car